MEMBER’S WORKING
PARTY DOCUMENT, 16th MARCH 2006
Page 2 of 8
In summary
the responses can be analysed as follows:-
| Against
the proposals |
| |
215 |
Individual
letters/emails |
| |
28 |
Standard
forms |
| |
221 |
Tick
box replies |
| |
|
|
| For
the proposals |
| |
13 |
Individual
letters/emails |
| |
|
|
| For
some proposals and against others |
| |
26 |
Individual
letters/emails |
| |
|
|
| Not
against |
| |
105 |
Individual
letters mainly for the cricket club wish for
extra land and no other views on the proposals |
| |
|
|
| Total |
611 |
|
In addition there are some e-mails which
have presented problems in opening. The account holders
have been contacted to re-send and a supplementary report
will be available at the meeting with the response
details.
All the email responses that were sent by the
public following the DCC’s decision to accept emails
were lost in a technical ‘black hole’ by the
DCC.
DCC has sent out emails to the addresses it has recovered
requesting they resend their emails. However they have
given only 3 working days to do this. If you sent an
email to elvastoncastle@derbyshire .gov.uk and you have
not received a resend, please contact us as soon as
possible.
A number of “late responses” have been received
after the 13th February 2006 as follows:-
| Against the proposals |
| |
6 |
Individual letters/email (1 with 8
signatures) |
| |
|
|
| For some proposals and
against others |
| |
1 |
Individual
letters/email |
| |
|
|
| Not against |
| |
17 |
Individual letters re cricket club
wish for extra land |
| |
|
|
| Total |
24 |
|
|
